University of Illinois: Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Visit Farmdoc

Navigate to Main « Previous: More on Position Limits, Excessive Speculation and the Dodd-Frank Act | Next: Farms and the New 2013 Medicare Tax Increases »

share this post   print this post


October 25, 2012

Wheat Feeding

Overview

In its October World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) increased the estimated feeding of wheat during the current 2012/13 wheat crop year by 95 million bushels to 315 million bushels. This change was prompted by the September 1 stocks report and suggests that increased feeding of wheat will join increased imports and reduced consumption as market responses to the drought-reduced 2012 corn and soybean crops. Therefore, this article examines the historic role of wheat feeding in the U.S. and the factors associated with it.

Data on Wheat Feeding

Data on the feeding of wheat were collected beginning with the 1974/75 crop year. The specific use category is "feed and residual.' Thus, this use category is best thought of as "use mostly for livestock feed." To simplify discussion of years, a crop year is referred to only by its first year. For example, the 1974/1975 crop year will be referred to as the 1974 crop year. The wheat crop year runs from June 1 through May 31.

Wheat Feeding as a Share of Total Wheat Use

USDA currently projects that the feeding of wheat will account for 12.7% of total projected use of U.S. wheat during the 2012 wheat crop year (see Figure 1). This exceeds the average share of 9.1% and is the highest share since the 2000 wheat crop year. Wheat feeding has ranged from 16 million bushels or a 0.7% share in the 2007 wheat crop year to 484 million bushels or a 19.9% share in the 1990 wheat crop year. No linear trend exists over time in the share of wheat that is fed. Historically, wheat feeding is usually concentrated in the first quarter of the wheat crop year, or June through August. In fact, between the 1974 and 2011 crop years, USDA reports that 15% more wheat was fed during the first quarter than was fed for the entire year. While not possible if the use category was only feeding, this data reporting relationship serves as a reminder of the important role residual use plays in this use category.


fig1.jpg


Wheat Feeding Decision

The decision to use any grain, including wheat, in feeding livestock is a complex management decision. Energy and nutritional needs in a balanced feed ration are specific to both the animal species and the type of animal within a species. Moreover, changing the mix of wheat in a ration during a feeding cycle can materially reduce feeding efficiency. Hence, livestock feeders want to be relatively certain that not only is wheat a cheaper source of feed now but will remain so throughout the feeding cycle. In other words, the decision to feed wheat is more of a longer-term strategic decision than a short-term tactical decision. This may partially explain why the share of wheat that is fed is positively and statistically significantly correlated in adjoining years: +0.42. Thus, high wheat feeding in one year is likely to be followed by high wheat feeding next year.

Given the important constraint on rations, economics suggest that the feeding of wheat should be related to (1) the competitiveness of wheat as a feed ingredient relative to the major feed grain, corn, and (2) the profitability of producing livestock and livestock products. For those who are interested, the measurement of these 2 variables used in this article is described in the text box at the end of this article.

Everything else constant, the higher is the ratio of wheat price to corn price; the more expensive is wheat as a feed ingredient relative to corn and the less wheat that should be fed. This expected negative relationship is reflected in the downward sloping straight line in Figure 2. Over the first 4 months of the 2012 wheat feeding year (June through September), the U.S. wheat-to-corn price ratio is 1.09, close to the lowest observed ratio of 1.08 for the 1990 wheat crop year. The average wheat-to-corn price ratio is 1.43, with the highest being 1.95 for the 2007 wheat crop year.


fig2.jpg


Everything else constant, the higher is the profitability of producing livestock and livestock products, the greater is the share of wheat that should be fed. This expected positive relationship is reflected in the upward sloping straight line in Figure 3. So far during the 2012 wheat feeding year, the measure of livestock and livestock product profitability is 0.62. This is the second lowest to 0.59 for the 1974 wheat crop year. The average livestock and livestock product profitability measure is 1.00, with the highest being 1.56 for 1986.


fig3.jpg


2-Variable Relationship

Including both variables in the analysis increases the explanation of the variation in the share of wheat that is fed (see Figure 4). Individually, the wheat-to-corn price ratio and livestock and livestock product profitability explains 13% and 28%, respectively, of the variation in wheat feeding across the wheat crop years. In contrast, including both variables together in the analysis explains 63% of the variation in wheat feeding. This finding illustrates the importance of examining the role of multiple variables when assessing economic relationships. The 2-variable relationship is presented at the end of this article in a text box.


fig4.jpg


The 2-variable relationship suggests USDA's estimate of wheat feeding during the 2012 wheat crop year may be too high: Based on the wheat-to-corn price ratio and measure of livestock and livestock product profitability through the first 4 months of the 2012 wheat crop year, the 2-variable relationship implies a 9.6% wheat feeding share of total use. In comparison, USDA's current estimated share is 12.7%. Examination of Figures 2 and 3 suggests this difference may be the result of the low profitability of producing livestock and livestock products. While projection is notoriously difficult and many experts expect the profitability of livestock and livestock product production to improve over the next year, this analysis suggests that to reach USDA's projected feeding of wheat, wheat will likely need to remain close to its post-1973 lows relative to corn.

Observations and Implications

  • Feeding of wheat during the current 2012 wheat crop year is likely to be a larger share of the total use of U.S. wheat than in recent years.
  • Increased feeding of wheat reflects a price of wheat that is near its post-1973 lows relative to the price of corn.
  • On the other hand, the low profitability of producing livestock and livestock products is a drag on the feeding of wheat.
  • The low profitability of producing livestock and livestock product suggests that the price ratio of wheat to corn will likely have to stay near its post-1973 lows if wheat feeding is to remain an important adjustment mechanism to the drought reduced crops of corn and soybeans.
  • While entirely speculative, it is possible that the drought of 2012 might mark the beginning of an extended period of above average feeding of wheat. More broadly, increased feeding of wheat in the U.S. could be one of the market responses to the increased use of corn in biofuels

.
tb1.jpg

tb2.jpg

Sources for Figures: Original calculations using data from U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service, Wheat Outlook, http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu; USDA, Office of the Chief Economist, http://www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/wasde/index.htm; and USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Quick Stats, http://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/; accessed 10/2012.

This publication is also available at http://aede.osu.edu/publications

Issued by Carl Zulauf and Nick Rettig
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics
The Ohio State University



Posted by Carl Zulauf and Nick Rettig  Permalink

We request all readers, electronic media and others follow our citation guidelines when re-posting articles from farmdoc daily. Guidelines are available here. The farmdoc daily website falls under University of Illinois copyright and intellectual property rights. For a detailed statement, please see the University of Illinois Copyright Information and Policies here.