Replacing an aging US farmer population continues to attract considerable attention from the general public and policy makers. This article uses data, in part from the 2017 Census of Agriculture, to provide perspective. As a group, the data do not make a convincing case for concern over replacing current US farm producers, although it does suggest questions for public policy discussion.
New and Beginning Farmers
The 2017 Census of Agriculture counted 3,300,834 farmers, of which 2,740,453 identified themselves as a principal farm operator. Approximately a quarter of both groups were new and beginning farmers, who were defined as operating any farm for 10 or fewer years (see Figure 1). New and beginning farmers may be on farms with established farmers (i.e. not new and beginning farmers). Characteristics were similar for both all and principal operator new and beginning farmers. The discussion will focus on all new and beginning farmers.
While younger than established farmers, new and beginning farmers span the age spectrum (see Figure 2). Only 26% of new and beginning farmers were 34 and younger; 12% were 65 and older. It is factually incorrect to associate new and beginning farmers with young farmers.
Compared with established farmers, new and beginning farmers were slightly less likely to be males and notably less likely to have farming as their primary occupation (see Figure 3). Over 50% of new and beginning farmers worked more than 200 days off the farm compared with 36% for established farmers.
New and beginning farmers have smaller farms on average, whether size is measured in acres or sales (see Figure 4). New and beginning farmers were, on average, approximately one-third smaller on both metrics. Eighteen percent of new and beginning farmers had farms with sales of $50,000 or more compared with 26% of farms without new and beginning farmers. Sales of $50,000 and more was the highest category reported for new and beginning farmers by the 2017 Census.
On average, farms with new and beginning farmers owned slightly less of their acres (see Figure 5). Primary reason is that they are more likely to be tenant farmers (i.e. all acres were rented). Fewer farms with new and beginning farmers were classified as oilseed and grain farms or as cotton farms according to the North American Industry Classification System used in the Census of Agriculture (see Figure 5). In contrast, more farms with new and beginning farmers were classified as livestock farms, in particular, sheep and goat farms (6% vs. 3%). The farm classification data suggest farms with new and beginning farmers were less likely to grow farm program crops.
Family Generation in Farming
The issue of new and beginning farmers is intertwined with the issue of intergenerational transfers of farms. A 2001 survey of farmers in 26 states (see Data Note) contained the following question: “On this farm or ranch, which generation does the current operator represent (including your family or your spouse’s family)?” Respondents were asked to check a box for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 or more generations. Respondents classified 36% of their farms as 1st generation, a share only slightly less than the 39% classified as 3rd and higher generation farms (see Figure 6). Only 4% were classified as 5th or higher generation farms. Compared with 3rd generation farms, 1st generation farms were smaller, provided a smaller share of family income, and were less dependent on farm program crops. These differences were significant at the 99% level of statistical confidence. They mirror the differences between established and new and beginning farmers in the 2017 Census of Agriculture. For additional discussion of the findings for the farm generation question, see Zulauf et al. (2004 and 2013).
New and beginning farmers occupy an important role in the US farm sector. They account for a quarter of all US farmers according to data collected in the 2017 Census of Agriculture.
The 2017 Census does not provide information on a key distinction, what share of new and beginning farmers are new to agriculture and what share are sons and daughters of current farmers.
Importance of this distinction is underscored by the finding in a 2001 survey that 1st generation farms occupy an important role in the US farm sector. They were estimated to account for one-third of farmers in the 26 states surveyed.
The share of farmers that are new and beginning farmers as well as the share that are 1st generation farmers suggests that entry into farming is not the barrier it is portrayed.
New and beginning famers and 1st generation farmers both depended more on nonfarm income than other farmers. This finding is consistent with nonfarm income being an important entry path to farming, implying entry paths to farming are broader than inheritance. Broader entry paths mitigate concerns about replacing US farmers.
Farm program crops account for a larger share of sales on established farms and on 3rd and higher generation farms. This finding raises an intriguing question: “Have farm programs raised the importance of inheritance and by extension, avoidance of inheritance taxes, in the US farm sector?”
The information in this article suggests that, if a farm entry issue exists, it is for young individuals who are not related to a farmer and have little nonfarm family income. Providing assistance to relatives of farmers is likely more about maintaining farms within a family than providing an entry opportunity. For individuals entering farming with capital accumulated from non-farm earnings and investments, their needs are likely to be assistance with skills specific to farm finance, management, and production of their chosen farm commodities, regardless of their age at entry. Effective policy requires recognizing the different needs of the different categories of new farmers and designing programs scripted for each new farmer category.
The 26 states were surveyed to provide insights into farmer opinions regarding potential issues during the debate over the 2002 farm bill. A total of 13,222 useable surveys were obtained. Responses were weighted based on survey methodology to generate a population estimate for each state. The state population estimates were summed to obtain estimates for the 26 states as a group. The 26 states contained 64% of all US farms in the 2002 Census of Agriculture. The farm generation question was subjective. Depending on their interpretation of their situation, respondents in the same objective situation could have answered the question differently. Nevertheless, it allowed survey respondents to provide an indication of the extent to which their farm remained in their family across generations. For a detailed discussion of the survey and its methodology, see Lubben et al. (2001).
Lubben, B. D., C. J. Simons, N. L. Bills, N. L. Meyer, and J. L. Novak. “The 2002 Farm Bill: U.S. Producer Preferences for Agricultural, Food, and Public Policy.” National Public Policy Education Committee, Publication Number 2001-2. September 2001. https://www.farmfoundation.org/projects/the-2002-farm-bill-u-s-producer-preferences-for-agricultural-food-and-public-policy-36-d1/
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service. 2002 and 2017 Census of Agriculture. Accessed November 3, 2021. https://www.nass.usda.gov/AgCensus/index.php
Zulauf, C., F. Yavuz, and B. D. Lubben. 2004. Attributes of U.S. Farms by Number of Generations the Farm has been in a Family. Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. Pages 135-138.
Zulauf, C., F. Yavuz and B. Lubben. "Number of Generations a Farm Has been in a Family." farmdoc daily (3):232, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, December 6, 2013.
Disclaimer: We request all readers, electronic media and others follow our citation guidelines when re-posting articles from farmdoc daily. Guidelines are available here. The farmdoc daily website falls under University of Illinois copyright and intellectual property rights. For a detailed statement, please see the University of Illinois Copyright Information and Policies here.